Mass. lawmakers want tighter rules for vaccines

Christian Wade / Newburyport News / Monday, September 16, 2019

Donato and Rausch’s legislation is expected to face less opposition, though it has yet to be scheduled for a committee hearing.

Even the Massachusetts Family Institute, which strongly opposes the medical society’s stance on religious exemptions, doesn’t have a problem with the new proposal as written.

“It seems the intent of this bill is not eliminating an important example of parental rights and religious freedom, but rather emphasizing awareness of the potential health risks of vaccine exemptions and better data collection,” Andrew Beckwith, the institute’s president, said in a statement. “To that extent, it is consistent with the fundamental right of parents to direct the health care of their children.”

He said immunization rules “should continue to balance public health concerns with these parental rights and religious freedom for the relative few that seek exemptions.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Beacon Hill Roll Call: How local pols voted on handheld cell phone ban

Bob Katzen / Taunton Daily Gazette / Saturday, September 14, 2019

GENDER X (H 3664) — The State Administration and Regulatory Oversight Committee held a hearing on a proposal that would allow Bay Staters to choose the gender-neutral designation “X” in lieu of “male” or “female” on state identifying documents including birth certificates, marriage licenses, driver’s licenses, learner’s permit, identification cards and liquor purchase identification cards. The Senate approved a similar proposal in April. Fourteen states and the District of Columbia currently allow a gender-neutral option on driver’s licenses…

…“If you look at your Massachusetts driver’s license, it lists ‘sex,’ not ‘gender,‘” said Massachusetts Family Institute President Andrew Beckwith. “The concept of ‘gender identity’ is based on internal feelings, but sex is binary (male or female) and grounded in biology. And we believe that a state ID should reflect that objective fact.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bill would require gender ‘X’ option on all state documents

Mary Markos / Boston Herald / Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Advocates for a gender “X” designation on state documentation say making people chose male or female is akin to making them lie, while opponents argue that a person’s sex is a biological fact.

“If you look at your Massachusetts driver’s license, it lists ‘sex,’ not ‘gender,’” Andrew Beckwith of Massachusetts Family Institute told the Herald. “The concept of ‘gender identity’ is based on internal feelings, but sex is binary (male or female) and grounded in biology, and we believe that a state ID should reflect that objective fact.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Gender x bill supporters press for vote in House

Matt Murphy / State House News Service / Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Critics of the legislation, including former House lawmaker and Massachusetts GOP Chairman Jim Lyons, have raised concerns regarding public safety and confusion for law enforcement, while Massachusetts Family Institute Executive Director Andrew Beckwith said driver’s licenses should reflect a person’s sex, not their gender.

“The concept of ‘gender identity’ is based on internal feelings, but sex is binary (male or female) and grounded in biology, and we believe that a state ID should continue to reflect the objective fact of sex, not gender,” Beckwith said.

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts ‘gender X’ bill up for debate

Rick Sobey / Boston Herald / Sunday, September 8, 2019

Advocates for a bill to let people choose “X” as a gender on driver’s licenses and birth certificates plan to show up in full force for a hearing this week on Beacon Hill, but opponents said they’re gearing up to push back against the “radical left” legislation…

…President of Massachusetts Family Institute Andrew Beckwith said that IDs should reflect “objective facts, not someone’s mental or emotional state.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Beacon Hill Roll Call: A look at major legislation in 2019 so far

Bob Katzen / Wicked Local Hanover / Sunday, September 8, 2019

Mental health experts and LGBTQ groups charge that the practice is scientifically unproven and unsound and can trigger depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts in these youngsters.

“We can offer assurances to those still struggling with coming out, or whose parents are still coming to terms with their orientation or identity, that that they will not be sent to a licensed therapist to change who they know themselves to be,” said Rep. Jack Lewis (D-Framingham) at the time of the vote.

“This vote was an appalling assault on parental rights in the commonwealth,” said the president of the Massachusetts Family Institute Andrew Beckwith who opposed lifting the ban. “Over 140 of our state legislators apparently believe that parents should not be able to get gender-confused children any treatment, even counseling, that might help them avoid cross-sex hormone injections, sterility or ‘transition’ surgery.

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

2020 Ballot Taking Shape

Christian Wade / The Salem News / Wednesday, September 4, 2019

Healey’s office also certified a proposal to put a question on the November 2022 ballot asking voters to amend the state Constitution overturn a 1981 Supreme Judicial Court ruling that requires the state to fund abortion services. Backers of the proposal, which includes the Massachusetts Family Institute, proposed a similar initiative for the 2020 ballot but fell short of required signatures.

To get on the ballot, that proposal also needs approval from 50 members of the 200-member Legislature, meeting in two successive constitutional conventions.

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts Family Institute

Adam Miller / Songtime Radio / Saturday, August 31, 2019

(CLICK HERE TO LISTEN).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Alliance aims to correct injustice against the preborn

Charlie Butts / One News Now / Tuesday, August 6, 2019

Once upon a time, Massachusetts did not use state revenue to terminate unborn children. But that was before the courts got involved. In 1981, the Supreme Judicial Court, the state’s highest court, ordered that the state had to fund abortions through Medicaid.

Now, nearly 40 years later, the Massachusetts Family Institute (MFI) has launched a third petition drive.

“What we’re trying to do is amend the state constitution to correct that injustice and make sure that the people of the Commonwealth are not forced into being complicit with abortion by funding it with tax dollars,” MFI President Andrew Beckwith tells OneNewsNow.

He recognizes the challenge the Massachusetts Alliance to Stop Taxpayer Funded Abortion has ahead of it.

“This time around, they’re going to need to gather over 80,000 certified signatures to get it on the ballot, so that’s a big lift,” Beckwith relays. “They’ll have 90 days to do it this fall, and I’m hopeful they’ll be successful.”

If they are, supporters will have to obtain at least 25 percent of the votes from both houses of the legislature in two consecutive state constitutional conventions before voters will have a chance to decide the issue. The earliest that would likely happen is the year 2022.

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Hank Stolz / Talk of the Commonwealth / Thursday, August 1, 2019

The debate surrounding Sex Ed in Worcester Public Schools has reignited In the wake of the Planned Parenthood endorsements for Worcester City Council and School Committee.

One of the major players in the debate surrounding comprehensive sex ed in WPS was the Massachusetts Family Institute. MFI was instrumental in the pushback against the implementation of comprehensive sex ed in WPS.

We had the President of MFI Andrew Beckwith on the show to talk about the issue.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Foes of Massachusetts assisted-suicide bill warn of ramifications

Mary Markos / Boston Herald / Friday, June 28, 2019

Opponents of a bill to legalize medical aid in dying, known as death with dignity, argue that insurance companies could opt for the “cheaper” option and stop covering expensive medical treatments.

“At the legislative hearing on Tuesday, we heard testimony about insurance companies refusing to pay for life-giving treatments and offering much cheaper suicide drugs as an alternative,” Andrew Beckwith of Massachusetts Family Institute said. “We have the best health care in the world here in Massachusetts, and this bill would be a huge step backwards for quality of care and the rights of patients.”

Beckwith and other organizations are pushing back against the legislation, pointing to testimony from people like Stephanie Packer, a California woman who said her insurance would no longer cover chemotherapy after physician-assisted suicide was legalized in her state. She traveled to Massachusetts earlier this week to testify against the bill in a Joint Committee on Public Health hearing.

“I can’t describe what it feels like when someone tells you that they’re no longer going to pay for drugs that will extend your life significantly, that will give me more time with my kids,” Packer said. “But for a buck I can go ahead and make it stop if I kill myself.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

‘Death with dignity’ push gaining ground in MA

Chris Woodward / One News Now / Tuesday, June 25, 2019

Lawmakers in Massachusetts are debating today about doctor-assisted suicide.

Today’s discussion will take place in the Joint Committee on Public Health, where advocates for the proposal call it “death with dignity” but Andrew Beckwith of Massachusetts Family Institute says the method is still assisted suicide.

“They’ve been after this for years,” he advises. “They took it to the vote of the people on a ballot referendum in 2012 and it was defeated in large part due to the great work of the Church, particularly the Catholic archdiocese of Boston.”

The ballot measure was defeated 51-49 percent after a “ferocious political battle,” The Boston Globe reported at the time. 

Opponents of the “death with dignity” referendum organized in the final weeks after a poll showed support for the measure, the newspaper reported, and the public was flooded with messages of opposition from religious leaders, pro-life activists, and a physicians group.

The bill requires two witnesses to sign a written request for the lethal drugs. However, one of the witnesses can legally be someone who stands to enjoy an inheritance from the person that is about to die, which creates an obvious scenario for greed.

Beckwith gives one chilling example: a dying woman’s grandson convinces her to swallow the poison pill while scheming with a girlfriend to sign as witnesses. But there is little evidence of their misdeeds.

“There would be no record for the rest of the family members to know what actually happened,” Beckwith says, “because doctors are prohibited from putting anything on the death certificate other than the underlying disease.”

Beckwith expects pushback this time around and is urging the public to contact their legislators and tell them to oppose the “death with dignity” legislation.

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE).

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Natick Teen Inspires Gender Identity Bill in Massachusetts

Mike LaCrosse / CBS (Boston) / Wednesday, June 19, 2019

The Gender Identity Bill passed the Senate this spring and is now waiting for consideration in the House.

If passed it would allow someone to check “X” instead of “Male” or “Female” for a license, ID or birth certificate. It would also require the Office of the Attorney General to create a report detailing all state documents where someone is required to indicate their gender…

The Massachusetts Republican Party is against the bill.

“Implementing this added regulation will just be another unnecessary cost to the hardworking taxpayers of Massachusetts. The added bureaucracy will also make the tough job of law enforcement even tougher,” said Massachusetts Republican Party Chairman Jim Lyons.

The Massachusetts Family Institute is also opposed.

“If you’re male or female that’s a biological fact that your identification should reflect,” said Massachusetts Family Institute President Andrew Beckwith.

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Watch: Massachusetts Doctors Support Infanticide Bill, but ‘Not Familiar with that Particular Section’

Dr. Susan Berry / Breitbart / Wednesday, June 19, 2019

“In a video clip of testimony provided by Massachusetts Family Institute (MFI), both Dr. Carole Allen, vice president of the Massachusetts Medical Society, and Dr. Luu Ireland, OB/GYN at UMass Memorial, are heard telling members of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary they support S. 1209, titled An Act to Remove Obstacles and Expand Abortion Access (ROE).”

Andrew Beckwith, a Massachusetts attorney and president of MFI, told Breitbart News when his organization was present at the testimony of the doctors, he expected to see some “back and forth on what really is the infanticide provision of this bill that removes an existing requirement that’s been on the books in Massachusetts since 1974.”

“So, when this doctor, who is the vice president of the Massachusetts Medical Society testifies that her organization supports this bill and is questioned on this provision, she’s unaware that it’s even in the bill,” he said incredulously.

Beckwith said the ROE Act allows abortion “from conception to crowning.” He added the legislation would allow abortions in the latter part of pregnancy to be performed at abortion clinics such as Planned Parenthood, rather than solely in hospitals.

When he testified before the Judiciary Committee on Monday, Beckwith directed his attention at one point to the proposed elimination of the requirement of parental consent for a minor’s abortion.

“This is the day after Father’s Day and the supporters of the ROE Act are unapologetically saying, in the context of abortions for underage girls, fathers and mothers are nothing more than ‘obstacles’ to be removed,” Beckwith observed.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Sarah Schweinsberg / The World and Everything In It / Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Andrew Beckwith is president of the Massachusetts Family Institute. He says his organization immediately began strategizing to repeal the bill.

BECKWITH: There’s a provision of the Massachusetts Constitution that allows for that. So we had to gather in the summer of 2016, about 50,000 signatures over the course of 45 days.

The group succeeded but missed the deadline to get a referendum on the 2016 ballot.

Beckwith says that gave the Keep Massachusetts Safe campaign two years to educate voters. The campaign wants people to know how the law especially endangers women and children.”

(CLICK HERE TO LISTEN)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Possible $50,000 Penalty For Repeatedly Violating Massachusetts Gender Identity Law, No-on-Question-3 Advocate Says

Matt McDonald / NewBostonPost / Thursday, October 4, 2018

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, appeared on the Howie Carr Showon WRKO AM-680 in Boston on Wednesday night to talk about a Milton beauty parlor called Belle Visage, which refused to perform a bikini wax on a biological male who identifies as a woman.

New Boston Post broke the story last week.

The Massachusetts Family Institute, a nonprofit organization that advocates for Judaeo-Christian values on Beacon Hill, is campaigning for a No vote on Question 3, which asks voters if they want to uphold (by voting Yes) or end (by voting No) a July 2016 state statute that prohibits discriminating on the basis of gender identity in public accommodations, which include public bathrooms, locker rooms, retail stores, restaurants, and beauty parlors, among other places.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Howie Carr / The Howie Carr Show / Wednesday, October 3, 2018

“A civil complaint against a spa in Milton sparks a discussion about gender identity.”

MFI’s Andrew Beckwith discusses with Howie Carr.

(CLICK HERE TO LISTEN)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Transgender Man Used Massachusetts Gender Law to Force Women to Wax His Genitals

Dr. Susan Berry / Breitbart / Saturday, September 29, 2018

“Under the #BathroomLaw that we are working to repeal, a biological male has the legal right to request a “full Brazilian” and to receive it from women against their will.

MFI’s @andrewbeckwith discusses in this blog post: https://t.co/i072DOfsaz#keepmasafe #VoteNoOn3 #mapoli

MA Family Institute (@MAFamilyInst) September 28, 2018

Massachusetts Family Institute is also opposing the law.

Andrew Beckwith, the group’s president, said in a blog post, ‘What’s even worse, under the gender identity law we are working so hard to repeal, this man has the legal right to that ‘service’ and to receive that service from women against their will.’

Beckwith said given that Dunn helped the man with his complaint, it is ‘now undeniable that the activists promoting this law fully intend to use it to force women to do things against their will with male bodies.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Beyond common sense

Kiley Crossland / WORLD / Friday, September 28, 2018

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, used this illustration: If, when waiting for his 8-year-old daughter to change clothes after her swimming lessons, he were to see a man walking into the women’s dressing room and try to stop him from entering until his daughter came out, under current Massachusetts law he could be sued for discrimination.

‘This is an ideological battle,’ Beckwith told me. ‘The bathrooms are a firewall of objective reality.’

In an age of heightened awareness of sexual violence against women, Beckwith said it doesn’t make sense that women are being silenced if they feel uncomfortable by the presence of a naked male body. When asked about a sexual-assault survivor’s concern that seeing a male body in a private space would traumatize her, Beckwith said a proponent of the bill countered that a transgender woman is a woman, so the victim had nothing to fear.

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Transgender Customer Demanded ‘Full Brazilian’ From Beauty Salon Under Massachusetts Gender Identity Law

Matt McDonald / NewBostonPost / Tuesday, September 27, 2018

“Opponents of the gender identity statute say the complaint against the spa shows why voters should vote no on Question 3.

‘My hope is that people understand that this is the inevitable consequence of this law,” said Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, in an interview.

Chanel Prunier, executive director of the Renew Massachusetts Coalition, which also opposes the gender-identity law, said the law puts women in the beauty industry in an untenable position.

‘No law should force a woman to touch a man in a place she doesn’t feel comfortable, and she shouldn’t be forced to choose between her livelihood and touching the genitals of someone she doesn’t want to touch,’ Prunier said in an email message. ‘This law goes way too far and should be repealed.’

The Massachusetts Family Institute, which advocates for Judaeo-Christian values in public policy, helped collect signatures to put Question 3 on the ballot to try to overturn the gender identity law. The statute is often called the Bathroom Bill because it guarantees people a right to use a public bathroom that corresponds to the gender they identify with even if it doesn’t correspond to their biological sex.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

After threatening churches, liberal MA sweating over ‘No on 3’

Chris Woodward, Billy Davis / One News Now / Thursday, September 20, 2018

“Similar non-discrimination laws routinely include eye-popping fines that target non-compliant business owners, but the Massachusetts Family Institute has told OneNewsNow that the law targets individuals. That means a father could be arrested and fined if he confronts another man entering a women’s restroom with his daughters.

The Boston Globe story mentions the 30-second ad but failed to dispute its claims.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

California Democrat Shelves Bill to Ban Adult Sexual Orientation Counseling

Dr. Susan Berry / Breitbart / Saturday, September 1, 2018

“Though 14 states have passed such a ban on counseling children with sexual orientation and gender issues, a bill to ban the counseling died in Massachusetts in early August when an amendment that was added led to its demise. The provision called for such therapy to be considered child abuse and would thus have required mandated reporters to notify Child Protective Services if they had learned children were in treatment that did not immediately affirm that they are gay or transgendered.

The addition of the controversial amendment caused the state Senate to pass a version without the child abuse provision – but only after the deadline for adjournment of both the state House and Senate.

Massachusetts Family Institute’s Andrew Beckwith explained, ‘[R]adical LGBT activists in the Senate demanded that the child abuse provision be put back in, which would have sent the bill back to the House to be voted on again.’

Beckwith said he was ‘relieved to see that parents and children will continue to have the freedom to seek the counseling they choose’ in Massachusetts.

‘This bill was a clearly unconstitutional violation of the rights of parents and the freedom of speech,’ he added.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

How to defeat ‘absolute insanity’

Kiley Crossland / WORLD / Friday, August 31, 2018

“The tactic effectively highlighted the ‘absolute insanity of what they were trying to do,’ Lyons said, noting it is an indisputable biological fact that humans are male or female. ‘To use driver’s licenses to promote a political agenda is not what we should be doing.’

‘Rep. Lyons called their bluff and demonstrated where the logic of this uncoupling of identity from reality ultimately leads,’ said Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute.

When asked what kind of feedback he received from his House colleagues, Lyons said, ‘I can’t tell you how many Democrats came up to me afterwards and said, ‘Jim, thank you very much. I didn’t want to vote on that anyhow.’”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Transgender Driver’s License Bill Derailed After Vote Forced on the 73 Facebook Gender Options

Brandon Showalter / The Christian Post / Tuesday, August 21, 2018

“‘Rep. Lyons called their bluff and demonstrated where the logic of this uncoupling of identity from reality ultimately leads,’ said Andrew Beckwith, president Massachusetts Family Institute, in a statement to The Christian Post Monday.

In a Boston Herald column last week, New England radio host Howie Carr concurred.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Voters force referendum on dangerous pro-LGBT bathroom law

Chris Woodward / One News Now / Friday, August 17, 2018

“If you live in Massachusetts, the midterm elections aren’t the only thing to keep an eye on this fall.

In addition to determining Senate, House, and gubernatorial races, voters in The Bay State will decide in November whether to overturn a 2016 law allowing people to use bathrooms and locker rooms for the gender with which they say they identify. Andrew Beckwith, president of Massachusetts Family Institute, says the law puts women and children at risk of sexual predators who take advantage of the policy.

Pointing to a nationwide study this year by the group Woman Means Something, Beckwith says incidents in Target stores are all the more reason for repeal.

‘A couple of years ago, Target very publicly changed their store policy across the country to say if you feel like a woman, you can use the women’s restroom or changing room,’ he explains. ‘The study looked at the incidents of voyeurism or up-skirting or illegal photographing that happened in Target stores, and what they found is there was a real uptick after that policy was announced.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Legislators Defeat Planned Parenthood Bill to Teach 12-Year-Old Kids About Oral and Anal Sex

Micaiah Bilger / Life News / Friday, August 10, 2018

“The bill seemed harmless enough at first. It would have required public schools to provide ‘comprehensive’ sex education that is medically accurate and age-appropriate. This included “the benefits of abstinence and delaying sexual activity” and “the effective use of contraceptives and barrier methods.”

However, Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, examined the bill closely and discovered the ‘age-appropriate’ recommendations were more than what they seemed.

He found that one of the recommended curricula was ‘Get Real,’ published by Planned Parenthood. The middle school program teaches children as young as 12 ‘how to perform oral and anal sex,’ Beckwith wrote at the New Boston Post in July.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts bill dies that would teach 12-year-olds how to perform oral, anal sex

Greg Piper / The College Fix / Thursday, August 9, 2018

Massachusetts Family Institute President Andrew Beckwith looked at several of the department’s recommended curricula before the Senate vote a year ago, and learned firsthand what the state considers “age-appropriate.”

Writing for NewBostonPost, Beckwith said the recommended “Get Real” middle-school curriculum, published (unsurprisingly) by the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, gives instructions on “how to perform oral and anal sex”:

Let that sink in. The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education wants to teach your seventh-grade sons and daughters, some as young as twelve, about anal sex. …

Not satisfied with merely introducing the concept of certain non-reproductive sex acts, “Get Real” goes on to teach twelve-year-olds in eye-watering detail how to properly use a “dental dam,” which is “placed over the vulva … or anus during oral sex.” Concerned that your seventh-grader might not have a “dental dam” handy? No problem. State education officials and Planned Parenthood want your child to know they can “also use non-microwavable saran wrap.” [This reference also happens to dilute S.C. Johnson & Son’s trademark.] When the nation’s largest abortion provider tells young children to make their own prophylactics at home out of kitchen implements, that ought to concern us.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

In An Eros-Infused Society, Beacon Hill Is Still Sex Shy

Mike Deehan / WGBH  / Wednesday, August 8, 2018

“Rep. James O’Day, the House sponsor of the sex ed bill said that earlier in the session, he felt encouraged that the legislation could pass this year. Then, he says, social conservative forces like the Massachusetts Family Institute targeted more conservative House Democrats with what he calls misinformation about the bill.

The Massachusetts Family Institute has distributed materials opposing the sexual education bill, saying it takes decisions over what and when to teach out of the hands of local school districts.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

MFI claims victory, looks ahead to November

Chris Woodward / One News Now / Monday, August 6, 2018

“Since January of last year, the Massachusetts Family Institute (MFI) has spoken out against Planned Parenthood’s Sex Ed Mandate, a ban on counseling for minors with unwanted same-sex attraction, and an anti-religious liberty bill, among other measures. But the Massachusetts House and Senate adjourned their final formal session of the 2017-2018 legislative cycle last Wednesday, and all of the major bills the Institute has been fighting failed.

‘That means the bills I’ve been writing about since January of last year will not become law, and their supporters will have to start the whole legislative process all over again in January of 2019,’ cheers Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bill to Ban Sexual Orientation and Gender Counseling Dies in Massachusetts

Dr. Susan Berry / Breitbart / Saturday, August 4, 2018

“The amendment was cause for concern, leaving the state Senate to pass a version without the child abuse provision – but only after the deadline for adjournment of both the state House and Senate.

Andrew Beckwith of the Massachusetts Family Institute noted ‘radical LGBT activists in the Senate demanded that the child abuse provision be put back in, which would have sent the bill back to the House to be voted on again.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Saran Wrap Sex-Ed Bill Fails

NBP Staff / NewBostonPost / Wednesday, August 1, 2018

“Supporters said that the bill would ensure that students in school districts where sex education is taught are given medically accurate information that would help keep them from getting venereal disease and help them avoid unwanted pregnancies.

Opponents said the bill would force teachers to promote unsafe, immoral, and degrading sexual practices among students, including those too young to hear about them. They also argued that local school officials ought to be able to made their own decisions about sex education without state education officials telling them what to do.

The bill was the subject of a widely read column in New Boston Post last year by Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, who argued that it could end up requiring local school officials to teach 12-years olds about anal and oral sex.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Conversion Therapy Ban Fails in Massachusetts Legislature

Matt McDonald / NewBostonPost / Wednesday, August 1, 2018

“As a result, so-called ‘conversion therapy’ remains legal in Massachusetts, although it’s unclear if any mental-health therapists in the state are practicing it.

‘We are relieved to see that parents and children will continue to have the freedom to seek the counseling they choose,’ said Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, who opposes the bill, in an email message. ‘… The bill was defeated by all the hard work of our allies in the House and Senate, backed up by the phone calls and emails from MFI’s thousands of Bay State supporters.’

The original version of the bill called for disciplinary measures against therapists who practice conversion therapy with a patient under 18, including revoking their license. It also defined subjecting a child to conversion therapy as child abuse, and required that so-called ‘mandated reporters’ such as teachers and doctors notify the state’s social-services agency if they learn of such a case.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts repeals long-dormant ban on abortion

Jamie Halper / The Boston Globe  / Friday, July 27, 2018

“Anti-abortion advocates were disappointed with Baker’s decision to sign the legislation.

Andrew Beckwith, president of the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, said that because there was no immediate threat that abortion might become illegal in the state, the move demonstrates the legislators’ ‘obsession with the abortion agenda.’

‘The proponents of this legislation have liked to call the laws they’re now repealing archaic, but I’m looking forward to the day when the barbaric practice of killing children in their mothers’ wombs is archaic itself,’ he said.

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

The danger of ‘gender politics’ is real

Chris Woodward / One News Now / Wednesday, July 25, 2018

“Voters in the Bay State will weigh in this November on whether to overturn the state’s law allowing a man to use the women’s restroom and locker room or vice versa.

‘In Massachusetts, they refer to it as the ‘gender identity non-discrimination law’ [which] takes the term ‘gender identity’ and bootstraps it onto existing civil rights laws,’ explains Andrew Beckwith of Massachusetts Family Institute, an organization campaigning for repeal.

Beckwith suggests a possible scenario: ‘If I, as a father, say to a man who is trying to use the bathroom that my wife or daughter is in, or the locker room at the YMCA that my wife or daughter is in – if I say, Hey, hold on a second, sir, my wife and daughter are in there, I get treated the same way as if I said to that same person, Hey, this is for whites only.

‘[So] in other words, I face jail time and fines for discrimination, despite the fact that I’m just trying to maintain the privacy and safety of women and children.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bathroom Wars Reach Critical Mass.

FRC Action / Family Research Council / Friday, July 20, 2018

“This week, the far-Left announced a million-dollar ad buy for a massive push this fall. Of course, that over-the-top spending wouldn’t be necessary if their policy was as popular as LGBT activists say it is! For conservatives, meanwhile, there’s a very real opportunity here to send a message to the nation that transgender politics are out of step with even the most liberal Americans! As Massachusetts Family Institute’s Andrew Beckwith says, we can’t underestimate the importance of this moment.

‘This is an important fight for the Commonwealth and the pro-family movement, since Massachusetts could be the first state to attempt to repeal a law like this at the statewide level. We are ground zero! We need help, though, from faithful people across this country, because the other side is well funded and well organized. If we all come together we can and will defeat this horrible law.’

Join Massachusetts in a battle that could send transgender activists packing. See what you can do to help by visiting KeepMASafe.org!”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

MA. reps make late-session push for House sex ed bill vote

WBUR/ State House News Service / Thursday, July 19, 2018

“Opposing the bill, the Massachusetts Family Institute has predicted that educators will use ‘offensive material,’ questioned the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education’s involvement in health education frameworks standards, and speculated about possible instruction pertaining to abortion.

‘This bill failed in the house last session. Let’s make sure that happens again,’ the family institute says on its website. ‘Together, we can send a clear message to Beacon Hill that we DO NOT want Planned Parenthood poisoning the minds of our young children.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Saran-Wrap Sex-Ed Bill Supporters Make Late-Session Push for Vote

Michael P. Norton / State House News Service / Wednesday, July 18, 2018

“Opposing the bill, the Massachusetts Family Institute has predicted that educators will use ‘offensive material,’ questioned the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education’s involvement in health education frameworks standards, and speculated about possible instruction pertaining to abortion.

‘This bill failed in the house last session. Let’s make sure that happens again,’ the family institute says on its website. ‘Together, we can send a clear message to Beacon Hill that we DO NOT want Planned Parenthood poisoning the minds of our young children.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

After heated pot vote, Brockton residents and stakeholders react

Marc Larocque / The Enterprise / Tuesday, July 17, 2018

“‘I’m just disappointed with the result of the vote tonight,’ said Reid, who was also working with Trinity Baptist Church, the nonprofit Massachusetts Family Institute and others in opposition to commercializing recreational marijuana. ‘I knew it would be very close. It was one swing vote. I didn’t believe that person would take the position that they did, of not comprehending the reality of it. The city of Brockton, even though it may get $2 or $3 million in revenue annually, is going to be spending $6 to $10 million cleaning up the mess that this has created.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts ballot question 3: Transgender Anti-Discrimination

Kristin Toussaint / Metro / Tuesday, July 10, 2018

“Question 3 asks whether the Massachusetts’s Transgender Anti-Discrimination Law should still be in place. The law, which was passed in 2016, provides protections to the transgender community by banning discrimination on the basis of gender identity in places of ‘public accommodation,’ like bathrooms, restaurants and parks.

A ‘yes’ vote on the referendum would keep the current law in place and a “no” vote would repeal it.

The effort to repeal the law is backed by groups like Keep MA Safe and the Massachusetts Family Institute, which claim the law is dangerous to children and raises privacy and safety concerns.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Nurse staffing, transgender, political spending questions set for ballot

 / State House News Service / Monday, July 9, 2018

“A referendum on the 2016 statute, Question 3 followed a different process than the other two ballot questions, which are citizens’ initiatives. A yes vote on Question 3 would preserve the law granting people access to the public restrooms corresponding to their gender identity. A no vote would repeal it.

Led by the Massachusetts Family Institute, opponents of the transgender law mobilized two years ago, arguing that the law raises safety and privacy concerns. Supporters of the transgender law contend it has extended civil rights without negative safety consequences.

Yvette Ollada, a spokeswoman for the group Keep Massachusetts Safe, blamed the law for incidents involving men illegally videotaping or photographing women in changing rooms or restrooms. It is a crime to secretly photograph someone’s intimate parts. In two of the three incidents Ollada referenced, the men were arrested but without the transgender access law they likely would not have been able to access the facilities, she claimed.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts State Senator Introduces ‘NASTY Women’ Bill Ahead of Trump’s Supreme Court Pick

Timothy Meads / Townhall / Saturday, July 7, 2018

“The bill has outside support as well. ‘We are working furiously in Massachusetts to ensure that whatever happens on the Supreme Court, access to abortion in the commonwealth will not be in jeopardy,’ Rebecca Hart Holder of NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts told the Boston Herald.

But, there are plenty of pro-life advocates who see this as a misguided attempt for Democrats and pro-choice Republicans. ‘The federal right to abortion was wrongly rooted in a legal fiction,’ Massachusetts Family Institute president Andrew Beckwith rebuts. ‘Abortion is really fighting a losing battle.’

President Trump will announce his second Supreme Court nominee on Monday July 9th.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

LGBTQ advocate: Rights ‘hang in the balance’ on justice pick

Sean Philip Cotter / Boston Herald / Friday, July 6, 2018

“But Andrew Beckwith of the Massachusetts Family Institute said rulings such as the one that legalized same-sex marriage in 2015 are based on faulty legal reasoning. Beckwith said he hopes a court with another more originalist-leaning justice on it in the mold of previous Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch would rethink that ruling and others like it.

‘We’ve had bad decisions overturned in the past,’ Beckwith said. ‘I look forward to more of that in this next pick.’

Both sides cited cases such as the recent one involving a cake-shop owner’s decision not to make a cake for a gay wedding.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bay State pols look to protect abortion access

Sean Philip Cotter / Boston Herald / Friday, July 6, 2018

“Massachusetts Republicans are advocating for a constitutionalist justice — which they say will result in more anti-abortion rulings.

‘The federal right to abortion was wrongly rooted in a legal fiction,’ said Massachusetts Family Institute president Andrew Beckwith. ‘Abortion is really fighting a losing battle.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bill adding third gender choice for licenses, IDs nears passage

Brian Dowling / Boston Herald / Friday, June 29, 2018

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute said, ‘Driver’s licenses and other forms of ID are legal documents intended to reflect objective facts, like height, date of birth, current address and sex. I’m sure there are plenty of people who would rather not have their true height or age listed on their license, but that’s irrelevant.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Mass. considers a third gender option for IDs: ‘X’

/ Boston Globe / Friday, June 29, 2018

“Critics of the gender ID initiative raised considers whether Massachusetts would remain compliant with new national Real ID standards with the X option. Spilka addressed that during Senate debate on Thursday, saying that the federal law only requires that IDs have a gender marking, but not what that marking must be.

Andrew Beckwith, president of the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, said he opposes the change because gender is not a ‘verifiable fact’ and added that government IDs are meant to reflect ‘objective facts like height, age, and sex.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts Senate OKs bill to allow gender ‘X’ option

/ Associated Press / Thursday, June 28, 2018

Andrew Beckwith of the Massachusetts Family Institute opposed the bill.

‘Drivers’ licenses and other forms of ID are legal documents intended to reflect objective facts, like height, date of birth, current address, and sex. They are not designed to be tools for the fulfillment of someone’s sexual expression,’ Beckwith said. ‘I’m sure there are plenty of people who would rather not have their true height or age listed on their license, but that’s irrelevant.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned, Mass. likely to preserve abortion rights

/ Boston Globe / Thursday, June 28, 2018

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, a conservative advocacy group that opposes abortion rights, asserted that the ‘overwhelming majority of Americans favor at least some restrictions on abortion, and we’re hopeful that the Supreme Court will soon reflect that broad consensus.’

He said Massachusetts ‘has the lowest fertility rate in the nation and an average of 20,000 abortions per year. That should be of great concern to everyone who cares about the most vulnerable among us or the future of our Commonwealth as a whole.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Can 1st Amendment defeat faith-based counseling ban?

Chris Woodward / OneNewsNow / Wednedsay, June 27, 2018

“Known by its critics at Massachusetts Family Institute as the ‘counseling ban,’ the state House of Representatives passed House Bill 4014 by an overwhelming vote of 137 to 14.

The bill follows a similar pattern in other states, where homosexual activists label such counseling ‘conversion therapy’ and demonize it as dangerous and unhealthy for children.

Defenders of the professional counseling maintain that children who have been sexually abused, guided by their concerned parents, should have the legal right to seek the professional help they want.

‘This is a disappointment but not a surprise given how powerful the LGBTQ lobby is on Beacon Hill,’ responds Andrew Beckwith, president of Massachusetts Family Institute.

‘The good news,’ he adds, ‘is that the section of the bill that labeled biblical counseling on issues of human sexuality as ‘child abuse’ was dropped at the last minute.’

Despite the lopsided vote in the House, Beckwith credits supporters of Massachusetts Family Institute for sharing their concerns with lawmakers.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts House votes to ban conversion therapy

Katie Lannan / State House New Service / Wednedsay, June 27, 2018

“Though Peake said similar laws — 13 states have passed conversion therapy bans for minors — have survived legal challenges on First Amendment grounds, Billerica Republican Rep. Marc Lombardo warned the measure here could end up in court.

Andrew Beckwith, the president and general counsel of the Massachusetts Family Institute, said the bill would likely be deemed unconstitutional after a Supreme Court ruling Tuesday dealing with restrictions on ‘professional speech’ at crisis pregnancy centers.

‘We are currently working with attorneys at Liberty Counsel, as well as Alliance Defending Freedom, who successfully litigated yesterday’s Supreme Court victory on ‘professional speech,’ to explore all options available in defending therapists and the families they serve from this unconstitutional legislation,’ Beckwith said in a statement.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts House Passes ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ban – With A Twist

NewBostonPost / NewBostonPost / Wednedsay, June 27, 2018

“An opponent of the conversion therapy ban noted the removal of the child-abuse provision but stopped short of declaring victory.

‘We’re glad to see the Massachusetts House no longer thinks counseling is the same as ‘child abuse,’ but H.4664 is still an unconstitutional restriction on free speech for therapists and the families they serve,’ said Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, in a written statement.

The bill now goes to the Massachusetts Senate.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts Senate to vote on bill allowing ‘X’ as gender on state IDs

Shira Schoenberg / MassLive / Wednesday, June 27, 2018

“But Andrew Beckwith, president of the socially conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, said identification documents like driver’s licenses ‘are legal documents, intended to reflect objective facts, like height, date of birth, current address and sex. They’re not designed to be tools for the fulfillment of someone’s sexual expression.’

Beckwith said the documents should describe someone’s sex, which he called an ‘anatomical, biological fact,’ rather than their gender identity, which can change. Sex generally refers to someone’s physical reproductive characteristics, while gender refers to a person’s psychological identity.

Beckwith said it should not matter if someone does not want their sex included on identification. ‘I’m sure plenty of people would rather not have their true height or age listed on the license. It’s irrelevant, it should be objective facts,’ Beckwith said.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts House approves ‘gay conversion therapy’ ban

Steve Leblanc / Associated Press / Wednesday, June 27, 2018

“Rep. Marc Lombardo said he understands the impulse to protect children and opposes conversion therapy that brings pain and suffering to a child, but said the bill is written in a way that is in violation of the First Amendment right to free speech.

‘The idea that a doctor can’t speak to a 12-year old child about some alternatives maybe to permanent, life-changing surgeries without being in violation of the law and potentially losing their medical license is crazy to me,’ the Billerica Republican said, predicting that the bill will end up in court.

Andrew Beckwith of the Massachusetts Family Institute also opposed the bill.

‘I think everyone would acknowledge that sexual desires and feelings and gender identities exist sort of on a fluid spectrum. That’s what is sort of being taught in most public schools in Massachusetts,’ he said. ‘So why would we want to cut off avenues of therapy … among children who don’t want to act out on certain sexual desires or may want to live consistent with their anatomy?’

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

High Court Ruling on Abortion Counseling Breathes New Life Into Challenging Bans on ‘Conversion Therapy’

Matt McDonald / NewBostonPost / Wednedsay, June 27, 2018

“The Massachusetts House of Representatives is expected to vote on and likely approve a ban on so-called ‘conversion therapy’ today.

But opponents of the ban in Massachusetts are seizing on a portion of Justice Clarence Thomas’s majority opinion yesterday in a pregnancy-counseling case that challenges the reasoning two lower courts used last year to uphold bans on conversion therapy in other states.

‘The efforts of therapists and their clients in those cases stalled as judges ruled that the ‘professional speech’ between mental health professionals and the families they serve was not protected by the First Amendment to our Constitution. However, yesterday morning the Supreme Court of the United States said that it is,’ said Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, which advocates for Judaeo-Christian moral principles on Beacon Hill, in a written statement. ‘… We applaud that ruling, and we welcome the reassuring and common-sense explanation the Court gave for its decision. … The legislature must not be in the business of putting a gag on our counselors.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Massachusetts House bans ‘conversion therapy’ for gay youth

Shira Schoenberg / MassLive / Wednesday, June 27, 2018

“The conservative Massachusetts Family Institute argued that a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday related to disclosure requirements placed on anti-abortion pregnancy centers in California could threaten the bill. Part of that ruling stated that speech by professionals is protected.

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, said the group is asking lawmakers to ‘preserve our freedom to speak the truth.’

Rep. Jim Lyons, R-Andover, introduced an amendment that would have banned any practices that physically hurt a child, but allowed therapy that uses speech alone to try to change someone’s gender identity or sexual orientation.

‘We do not need to take away people’s First Amendment rights,’ Lyons said. ‘Speech is not unprotected merely because it is uttered by professionals.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

How Fathers, Present and Absent, Shape Our World

Josh Grambow / NewBostonPost / Sunday, June 17, 2018

“Nationwide, children from fatherless homes are more likely to live in poverty, suffer academic underachievement, become incarcerated, experience violence, become pregnant as a teen-ager, and more – but does this hold true in our commonwealth? A 2017 Massachusetts Family Institute report shows that, unfortunately, the stories of our boys are no different. Of all children in Massachusetts living in poverty, 51% have grown up with a never-married mother and 26% with a divorced or separated mother, in contrast to only 5% with a married father and mother. Median household income is consistently lower in Massachusetts cities like Springfield, Boston, and Lynn, where the percentage of children in married-parent households is lowest. Of children who have experienced neighborhood violence, 25% had never-married mothers and 16% divorced or separated mothers, compared to 4% with both married parents. Forty-one percent of all children experiencing violence in their Massachusetts neighborhoods grew up in fatherless families, compared to 4% who grew up with both married parents.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Lawmakers eye anti-discrimination bill

Matt Murphy / State House News Service / Wednesday, June 13, 2018

“The Massachusetts Family Institute, which is behind the effort this November to repeal a state law ensuring transgender people’s right to use public facilities that match their gender identity, filed a brief with the Supreme Court in the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

MFI President Andrew Beckwith called the court’s ruling ‘good news for all people of faith.’

‘The Court said today that ‘religious and philosophical objections to gay marriage are protected views.’ Disagreement isn’t disdain, and a Biblical worldview isn’t bigotry,’ Beckwith said in a statement. ‘In fact, the discrimination the Court ruled against today was state-based discrimination against a person of faith for his religious beliefs. Although this decision did not ultimately decide whose rights will prevail in contests between the First Amendment and sexually oriented non-discrimination laws, the Court ruled that these disputes have to be adjudicated fairly. In short, people of faith must get their day in court.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

After Supreme Court Ruling, Massachusetts House Takes Second Look At Discrimination Bill

Matt Murphy / State House News Service / Wednesday, June 13, 2018

“The Massachusetts Family Institute (MFI), which is behind the effort this November to repeal a state law ensuring transgender people’s right to use public facilities that match their gender identity, filed a brief with the Supreme Court in the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

MFI President Andrew Beckwith called the court’s ruling ‘good news for all people of faith.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Question of Transgender Protections to Hit Massachusetts Ballot

Alison King / NBC Boston / Tuesday, June 5, 2018

MFI’s Andrew Beckwith appears in NBC Boston to discuss the KeepMASafe campaign to repeal the Bathroom Law which threatens the privacy and safety of women and children in Massachusetts.

(CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

DeLeo: Unions should be protected barring SCOTUS ruling

State House News Service / NBC Boston / Monday, June 4, 2018

“DeLeo also called on Democrats to rally behind a law passed last year protecting the rights of transgender people to use the public facility of their choosing. A ballot question pushed by the Massachusetts Family Institute to repeal that law will go before voters in November, and DeLeo called on the party Saturday to turn away that repeal effort.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

‘This Isn’t About Cake’: Local Reaction to Supreme Court Ruling

Jonathan Choe / NBC Boston / Monday, June 4, 2018

MFI’s Andrew Beckwith appears in NBC Boston to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on Masterpiece Cakeshop.

(CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Supreme Court Sides With Colorado Baker

Meghna Chakrabarti, Chris Citorik, Kassandra Sundt / WBUR / Monday, June 4, 2018

“The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake for a same sex couple’s wedding. The decision has been called narrow, and does not address some of the larger free speech or religious liberty issues that were heard during oral arguments.

Guests

Noah Feldmanprofessor at Harvard Law School. He tweets @noahrfeldman.

Carol Roseexecutive director of the ACLU of Massachusetts.

David Frenchsenior writer for National Review. He tweets @davidafrench.

Mary Bonautocivil rights project director at GLAD.

Andrew Beckwithpresident of the Massachusetts Family Institute. He tweets @andrewbeckwith.”

(CLICK HERE TO LISTEN)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Shutting The Back Door:  How One Mother Sees Proposed Ban in Massachusetts on ‘Conversion Therapy’ for Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity

Matt McDonald / NewBostonPost / Tuesday, May 29, 2018

“In the midst of a recent trend, Massachusetts is not at the forefront but may be reaching for the pinnacle. Eleven other states have banned conversion therapy, including New Hampshire earlier this month. But the Massachusetts bill is unusual, says Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute.

‘Similar legislation has been passed in a number of states, but this is the first time that helping your child feel comfortable in their own body could brand you a child abuser,’ said Beckwith, whose organization advocates for Judaeo-Christian family values on Beacon Hill. ‘This is a bill that would allow the state to take away your daughter and make her someone else’s son.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Addressing a Lack of Sex Education in Mass.

Sue O’Connell / NECN/ Wednesday, May 16, 2018

“There is no requirement to teach sex education in Massachusetts’ police school. Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, and feminist writer/activist Jaclyn Friedman discuss with Sue O’Connell.”

(CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

In Massachusetts, no one wants to talk about sex ed

Stephanie Ebbert / The Boston Globe / Tuesday, May 08, 2018

“Still, Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, asserted that the legislation would give too much control to the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, which would set rules, ensure compliance with the law, and could recommend favored curricula.

‘It’s a very intimate personal topic that touches on families, relationships, faith and it’s in the realm of the rights and responsibilities of parents,’ Beckwith said. ‘Unlike math or geography or foreign languages, it’s a very controversial, sensitive topic. You want to make sure you have parental buy-in and cooperation.’

And while ‘age-appropriate’ and ‘medically accurate’ may sound innocuous, he suggested they may mean different things to different parents.

‘I don’t think we should be imposing one definition of those terms,’ Beckwith said.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Critics: Sex ed plan goes too far

Kathleen McKiernan / Boston Herald / Saturday, April 21, 2018

“The Massachusetts Family Institute is slamming a proposed sex health education bill for schools that emphasizes both abstinence and contraceptives, healthy relationships and consent, arguing that it is ‘widely inappropriate’ and takes control away from parents.

The Healthy Youth Act, backed by the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, would require any school teaching sex education to use a “medically accurate, age-appropriate” curriculum that encompasses healthy relationships, consent and includes information for students who identify with the LGBTQ community…

But the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute says it is forced ‘sexual education’ and ‘widely inappropriate.’

‘Right now, local schools have the ability to choose what curriculum they’d like to use,’ said Andrew Beckwith, president of the Family Institute. ‘My organization is trying to help parents maintain that control. It would give control to the state education department.’

Beckwith said he is worried the curriculum would be too similar to Planned Parenthood’s Get Real curriculum for middle schoolers, which he says refers to ‘oral’ and ‘anal’ acts that he deems too inappropriate for seventh- and eighth-graders.

‘It is something I feel most parents would not feel is appropriate to expose 12- and 13-year-olds to,’ Beckwith said.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Assisted suicide bill may see life again

Chris Woodward / OneNewsNow / Friday, April 20, 2018

“Another organization concerned about the bathroom law is the Massachusetts Family Institute. In a press release to supporters, MFI president Andrew Beckwith says their vote could be the difference.

‘Even The Boston Globe admitted that the fight for privacy and safety in Massachusetts will be close at the ballot,’ he says.

Beckwith adds that a repeal of transgender rights would send a message to the states that this is just too much. ‘It’s pushed beyond what common sense will allow,’ he adds.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Mass. is about to be a battleground over transgender rights

/ The Boston Globe / Tuesday, April 17, 2018

“If bluer-than-blue Massachusetts votes to repeal transgender rights, said Andrew Beckwith, one of those pushing for repeal, ‘it will send a real message to the rest of the country that this is just too much. It’s pushed beyond what common sense will allow.’

‘A man can enter a woman’s space at any time, without any proof of any sort of medical or psychological condition, merely based on his internal sense of self if he says he identifies as a woman,’ said Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute.

Opponents of the law take issue with the way ‘gender identity’ is defined — as someone’s sincerely held gender-related identity, appearance, or behavior, even if it differs from their physiology or assigned sex at birth. That definition goes beyond people who have had sex reassignment surgery, said Beckwith. And it’s not necessarily consistent over time; many people now consider gender to be fluid, meaning it could vary at different points in time.

‘How do you police that?’ Beckwith said.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Assisted suicide bill may see life again

Charlie Butts / OneNewsNow / Tuesday, April 3, 2018

“A traditional values organization based in Massachusetts has been gearing up for another battle against the assisted suicide movement, but it appears they will have time for preparation.

Both houses of the General Assembly have placed proposals on hold, meaning they will not receive consideration this year. The assisted suicide bills were “sent to study,” which effectively kills them for the remainder of this legislative session according to the Massachusetts Family Institute (MFI).

Andrew Beckwith, president of MFI, sees it as a loss of momentum for proponents. It’s been six years since they narrowly defeated a ballot provision calling for legalization in 2012. But HB1194/SB1225, the bill proposed this session, aims to resurrect the attempt to legalize doctor-prescribed suicide through the legislature.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Physician-assisted suicide bill dies in Massachusetts

Bradford Richardson / Washington Times / Tuesday, March 27, 2018

“There has been a years-long effort to legalize physician-assisted suicide in Massachusetts. Voters narrowly rejected a death-with-dignity ballot measure in 2012, 51 percent to 49 percent.

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, said there is a six-year moratorium on failed ballot measures in Massachusetts. So far, there is no effort to include physician-assisted suicide on this year’s referendum.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Troopers, Trump and Bolton

Steven Robinson / The Howie Car Show / Monday, March 26, 2018

MFI’s Andrew Beckwith discusses an MA bill that would require that male inmates who identify as female be housed with women (or whatever “gender identity” they choose).

Listen at the 20 minute mark:

(CLICK HERE TO LISTEN)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

A naked attempt to repeal religious rights

Chris Woodward / OneNewsNow / Monday, March 26, 2018

“House Bill 767, introduced by Rep. Michael Day, is attempting to strip businesses and corporations, and thus their owners, from First Amendment protection.

‘Some Democratic lawmakers in Massachusetts are taking a stand to stop corporations from using religious objections to discriminate,’ begins a celebratory story about the bill at the website lgbtqnation.com.

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, says Americans don’t lose their religious freedom when they open a family business.

‘Like the Green family in the Hobby Lobby Supreme Court case,’ says Beckwith, referring to the 2014 landmark ruling. ‘That court ruling affirmed that all Americans, including business owners, must be free to live and work consistently with their beliefs without fear of punishment by the government.'”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

 

Trump Swaps Complete Ban For ‘Qualified Ban’ On Transgender Military Service

Martha Bebinger / NPR / Saturday, March 24, 2018

“BEBINGER: In a memo filed yesterday, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis wrote about the voluntary limits on personal freedoms that men and women in the military must accept to be sure they are ready for combat. Some conservative Christian groups are pleased to see President Trump restrict service for transgender troops who have had surgery or who continue with hormone treatment. Andrew Beckwith is president of the Massachusetts Family Institute.

ANDREW BECKWITH: We think that’s a good move, restores the focus on military readiness and deployability that we had until roughly 18 months ago under the Obama administration.”

(CLICK HERE TO LISTEN)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Applauding mental illness in liberal Massachusetts

Bob Kellogg / OneNewsNow / Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Andrew Beckwith of the Massachusetts Family Institute says questioning the ‘mental stability’ of Daniels is an unpopular position to take, especially in a liberal state such as Massachusetts.

‘But really, if someone says they don’t know whether they’re male or female,’ says Beckwith, ‘that’s pretty concerning to me as a parent.’

The suicide rate among transgenders – who claim they don’t suffer from mental illness – hovers at a staggering 40 percent, 10 times higher than the general public.

Beckwith, meanwhile, says there is an ongoing trend among schools to embrace and promote transgenderism as normal behavior.

‘And tragically we’re seeing a lot of children, even children growing up in Christian families, having embraced this as normal and good,’ he complains, ‘because we’re getting hammered with it 40 hours a week in the public school system.’

Churches, he adds, don’t know how to respond to this relatively new issue.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bathroom Bill Repealers Release Hard-Hitting Video

Matt McDonald / NewBostonPost / Monday, March 19, 2018

Andrew Beckwith, legal counsel of the Keep MA Safe ballot question committee, said the video shows the dangers of the gender-identity-in-public-accommodations law.

‘There’s a misconception out there that this law applies only to individuals who have surgically altered their bodies. That’s simply not the case, and the video demonstrates that,’ Beckwith said in a written statement. ‘Any man can currently access a women’s facility, as the definition of ‘gender identity’ is extremely broad and fluid. As the ad also highlights, the law imposes significant fines and penalties on individuals who question anyone’s presence in sensitive areas, regardless of their appearance.’

Beckwith, who is also president of Massachusetts Family Institute, said two girls ages 15 and 17 helped make the video because they ‘recently felt helpless’ after privacy rights started disappearing at their school.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Students, Advocates Push for Overhaul of Sex Ed in Mass

Nick Neville / BU News Service/ Friday, March 2, 2018

“Mr. O’Day stressed that the bill would not be a statewide mandate for sex education, and noted that parents would have the opportunity to remove their children from school-based programs if they deemed it inappropriate. He also said that curricula would be available for any parent to review at home.

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, argued that it is effectively a mandate which goes too far.

‘This just takes control away from their constituents, and gives it to the state Education Department, and they’re pushing stuff that is anything but age-appropriate and medically accurate,’ he said.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bill Tests LGBT Rights, Religious Liberty

Chris Emma / NECN/ Thursday, March 1, 2018

Andrew Beckwith from the Massachusetts Family Institute and Rep. Mike Day (D) of Stoneham, Massachusetts, join guest host Chris Emma to talk about a new bill before the Massachusetts State Leigislature.”

(CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

UMass ‘firmly supports’ First Amendment rights, spokesman says in response to lawsuit over protest policy

Burlington & Beyond / Burlington & Beyond/ Tuesday, February 27, 2018

MFI’s Director of Family Alliances Michael King discusses pro-family issues on “Burlington & Beyond.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

UMass ‘firmly supports’ First Amendment rights, spokesman says in response to lawsuit over protest policy

Nick Neville / Worcester Telegram/ Tuesday, February 27, 2018

“Mr. O’Day stressed that the bill would not be a statewide mandate for sex education, and noted that parents would have the opportunity to remove their children from school-based programs if they deemed it inappropriate. He also said that curricula would be available for any parent to review at home.

Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, argued that it is effectively a mandate which goes too far.

‘This just takes control away from their constituents, and gives it to the state Education Department, and they’re pushing stuff that is anything but age-appropriate and medically accurate,’ he said.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Federal Rollback Of Transgender Protections Prompts Concern — But No Change — In Mass.

Max Larkin / WBUR/ Friday, February 23, 2018

“The federal recommendations from President Obama’s tenure were based in part on guidance developed in 2013 in Massachusetts and promulgated by the office of Mitchell Chester, commissioner of the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE).

Activist and attorney Andrew Beckwith remembered Chester’s 2013 guidance as ‘outrageous,’ and said he’s pleased its federal equivalent has been rolled back.

Beckwith is the president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, a conservative group that opposes same-sex marriage and works toward “‘strengthening the family and affirming the Judeo-Christian values upon which it is based.’

He recalled confronting the commissioner in 2013 with dozens of like-minded parents concerned about the privacy and safety of students — especially young women who they were appalled would be asked to share dressing rooms with people he described as ‘anatomical males.’

‘At that meeting, Chester said, ‘Look, this is policy guidance — guidelines, not a mandate.’ ‘ Beckwith said he and others took that to mean that in the end, individual districts and educators “had the right to decide how to handle these sensitive issues of gender identity.’

Beckwith hopes that in voiding the Obama-era guidance, Trump’s cabinet has further freed up local decision-makers to make different — and likely more limited — accommodations for transgender students.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

UMass ‘firmly supports’ First Amendment rights, spokesman says in response to lawsuit over protest policy

Stephanie Barry / MassLive/ Thursday, January 11, 2018

“The group’s lawsuit disagrees that the policy is constitutional, arguing the defendants have been “repeatedly warned” that it is problematic, in its view.

Consolini and the local chapter are being represented by attorneys with the Alliance Defending Freedom and the Massachusetts Family Institute.

The Alliance Defending Freedom bills itself as an advocacy group founded by religious right conservative leaders that champions ‘religious freedom, sanctity of life and marriage and family.’ The group is based in Scottsdale, Arizona.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Student group sues UMass, claiming free speech violation

Scott Merzbach / Amherst Bulletin/ Thursday, January 11, 2018

“‘UMass-Amherst’s speech policy contains provisions similar to those that courts have repeatedly struck down as unconstitutional at other schools,’ Alliance Legal Counsel Caleb Dalton said in a statement.

Consolini and the chapter, Dalton said, wanted to host and present speeches and to rally in other publicly accessible open areas of campus, but could be subject to sanctions if they did so.

Andrew Beckwith of Massachusetts Family Institute in Woburn is serving as local counsel for the case.

Pooja Bachani, a spokeswoman for Young Americans for Liberty, said in an email that such ‘free speech zones’ are not unusual at public universities, and this has likely affected many UMass students in the nearly three decades it has been in place.

‘It is safe to say that every student to walk through the campus gates since its passage has been adversely affected,’ Bachani said.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Domestic violence and LGBTQ groups offer support, advocacy following killing of Christa Leigh Steele-Knudslien in North Adams

Dan Glaun / MassLive/ Tuesday, January 9, 2018

“There are also political battles on the horizon for the state’s transgender rights advocates. Marianne Winters, executive director of Safe Passage, said her organization is concerned about a 2018 ballot question, put forward by the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, that would repeal the state’s recent transgender rights law.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Student activism group sues UMass Amherst officials over free speech policies

Stephanie Barry / MassLive/ Monday, January 8, 2018

“YAL was formed as a nonprofit to promote libertarian values, according to its website, including freedom of speech and the constitution.

The Amherst plaintiffs are being represented by attorneys with the Alliance Defending Freedom and the Massachusetts Family Institute, according to court filings.

The Alliance Defending Freedom bills itself as an advocacy group founded by religious right conservative leaders that champions ‘religious freedom, sanctity of life and marriage and family.’ The group is based in Scottsdale, Arizona.”

(CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE)