ARGUMENT: Why implementation of medical marijuana law must be delayed

The argument: The 63% vote, on November 6, 2012, in favor of Question 3 has been called “the will of the people”. It is a reasonable working assumption, based on the way the question was worded, that the will of the people is for marijuana to be an option safely available to profoundly ill citizens with specifically defined severe conditions for whom conventional medicine is not effective. It is reasonable to assume also that it was the people’s assumption that public health and safety would NOT be adversely affected. Given the unforeseen, unintended consequences to public health and safety that has occurred in other states with similar laws and that our voters were promised by proponents of the ballot question that if passed, Massachusetts would be among the safest, most tightly regulated medical marijuana programs in the country – it makes no sense, to enact this law on January 1st with no regulations at all.

Share:

More Posts

‘Pro-Choice’ Cambridge Targets PRCs

To no one’s surprise, Cambridge has jumped on the anti-life bandwagon. Last week, the Cambridge City Council held an Ordinance Committee hearing to discuss banning pro-life pregnancy resource centers (PRCs) from Cambridge. Through local advocates and new allies, MFI pushed back. In

Remembering Kris Mineau

On Monday, former Massachusetts Family Institute President Kris Mineau went home to be with the Lord. Kris served at the helm of MFI for over a decade, leading the pro-family movement in MA through the first in the nation fight to defend marriage. He

They can’t make our kids say it.

Last year, parents turned to MFI for help when their students were being required to sign a DEI Pledge in order to play high school sports. Requiring such a pledge is unconstitutional compelled speech. That’s why after MFI challenged the MIAA on