Testimony in Opposition to HB1540


Joint Committee on Public Health
May 10, 2010

Massachusetts Family Institute is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to strengthening the family and the traditional Judeo-Christian values upon which the family is based. We oppose HB 1540 because it would establish community based health and sexuality education services provided by comprehensive family planning agencies. The majority of family planning services belong to Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider who is implicated in circumventing statutory rape laws and being supportive of human trafficking.

Charging community based health and sexuality education service centers with the writing and publishing of specialized education and outreach programs is fraught with ambiguity and potential abuse. Specialized education is not defined. It can mean an objectionable website with questionable accuracy, or a hotline staffed by unqualified volunteers giving advice to desperate teenagers. As a minimum such education should involve qualified medical or mental health experts, as well as educators.

The recent controversy of the MariaTalks.com website and hotline initiative by the Dept. of Public Health is an example this type of ‘specialized education’ and ‘outreach programs’ designed to educate minors about sexuality. This website does nothing to increase parental involvement and circumvents discussions between children and their parents by telling minors that there are ways to get an abortion without parental consent. The site contains inaccurate medical information and the materials made available are one-sided, lacking information on important topics such as abstinence, failure rate of condoms and post abortion syndrome, to name a few.

The MariaTalks hotline gives callers advice on a broad range of topics including suicide prevention, dating, STDs and abortion services, but there are no legal guidelines in place for staffing hotlines of this nature. At question is the accountability for content, age-appropriateness, medical accuracy, legal parameters, circumvention of parental rights and using offensive language to convey their message.

There is no system of accountability for these types of programs. Educational matters belong within the Dept. of Education established within the curriculum frameworks. Under the jurisdiction of the DOE, content in all subject matters are scrutinized and voted on. Parents, school board members, educators and administrators have significant input into content and age-appropriateness. The parameters established in this bill are best left with the DOE.

Please give HB 1540 an unfavorable report.


Maureen Vacca
Director of Public Policy


More Posts

NBYPT Drag Show: It was what we thought it would be.

Many of you asked if we would follow up on last week’s email about the drag show for teenagers in Newburyport. After pushback from parents and concerned citizens, the city assured the public that it would not be a drag show, but

They’re Definitely Not Grooming Kids in Newburyport

Our culture has become so completely desensitized to the grotesque sexualization of children, people refuse to see it even when it’s right in front of their eyes. This is certainly true of a taxpayer funded group in Newburyport, MA that

BREAKING: 9-0 Victory in Boston Christian Flag Case!!

We all know that the Boston city government is ideologically liberal.  But now we have confirmation that they are to the left of every single justice currently sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court.  I got the news about a tremendous legal

Somerville Finally Allows Church To Open New School

SOMERVILLE SCHOOL COMMITTEE GRANTS PERMISSION FOR LOCAL CHURCH TO OPEN A RELIGIOUS SCHOOL AFTER MONTHS OF OPPOSITION. “If we didn’t vote to approve, we’d be sued and we would lose.” The showdown in Somerville has ended with a victory for